Skip to the content.

Cookware Supplier Evaluation Scorecard

📥 Download Raw Markdown Template 📄 View on GitHub

Use this scorecard to compare cookware suppliers after receiving catalogs, quotations, samples, factory information, and compliance documents. Adjust the weighting to match your project risk and business model.

[!TIP] Download Editable Excel Template: You can download a professionally styled and formula-enabled Excel spreadsheet version of this scorecard to automate your supplier calculations: 📥 Download Supplier Evaluation Scorecard (.xlsx)

Scoring suggestion:


Supplier Profile

Field Details
Supplier Name [e.g., Jiangmen Goldensea Housewares Limited]
Trading Company or Direct Manufacturer? [e.g., Direct Manufacturer]
Factory Location [e.g., Jiangmen, Guangdong, China]
Main Product Categories [e.g., Tri-ply Stainless Steel Cookware]
Key Customers / Target Markets [e.g., European retail brands / North American importers]
Social / Quality Audits Held [e.g., BSCI (Grade B) / ISO 9001 / SMETA]
Review Date [e.g., June 17, 2026]
Reviewer Name [e.g., John Smith (Lead Buyer)]

Scorecard Overview

Sourcing Criteria Weight Score (0-5) Weighted Score Key Strengths / Risks / Evidence
1. Material & Cladding Capability 15% [0-5] [e.g., 0.60] [e.g., Strong tri-ply line, SS316 interior available]
2. Factory Quality Audits (ISO 9001) 10% [0-5] [e.g., 0.40] [e.g., Valid ISO 9001 certificate, calibration logs verified]
3. Social Compliance (BSCI/SMETA) 10% [0-5] [e.g., 0.40] [e.g., BSCI Grade B, fire exits clear, PPE worn]
4. Raw Material Traceability (MTC) 10% [0-5] [e.g., 0.50] [e.g., Full MTC records per coil, chem analysis matches 304]
5. Multi-Stage QC Process (IQC/IPQC/FQC) 15% [0-5] [e.g., 0.60] [e.g., Independent IQC/FQC team, lab testing equipment on site]
6. Sample Quality & Dimensional Accuracy 15% [0-5] [e.g., 0.75] [e.g., Sample passed thermal shock & flatness checks]
7. B2B Commercial & Tooling Terms 10% [0-5] [e.g., 0.40] [e.g., MOQ 500 sets accepted, mold fee refunded at 5k units]
8. Communication & Project Management 15% [0-5] [e.g., 0.60] [e.g., Fast responses from sales, CAD drawings provided]
Total 100%   [e.g., 4.25] / 5.00  

Detailed Vetting Checkpoints

1. Material and Cladding Capability (15%)

Check whether the factory has the engineering competence to manufacture advanced multi-ply clad vessels.

2. Factory Quality Audits - ISO 9001 (10%)

Evaluate the factory’s Quality Management System (QMS) to ensure consistency across mass production runs.

3. Social Compliance & Safety - BSCI / SMETA (10%)

Ensure the manufacturer complies with labor laws, health & safety requirements, and ethical standards.

4. Raw Material Traceability & MTC (10%)

Prevent metallurgical substitution (e.g., replacing SUS304 with cheaper, low-nickel alloys during mass production).

5. Multi-Stage QC Process - IQC / IPQC / FQC (15%)

Verify that the factory does not rely solely on pre-shipment inspections, but inspects quality at every stage.

6. Sample Quality & Engineering Checks (15%)

Assess the physical quality of first samples using our test protocols.

8. B2B Commercial & Tooling Terms (10%)

Check the supplier’s commercial terms for alignment with B2B buying policies.

9. Communication and Project Management (15%)

Verify the team’s response speed, technical knowledge, and willingness to cooperate.


Sourcing Decision Summary

[ ] Approved (Primary Supplier): Score $\ge 4.2$, meets all QMS, social compliance, and technical specs.
[ ] Approved (Backup Supplier): Score $3.5 - 4.1$, acceptable quality but requires closer monitoring.
[ ] Hold / Re-evaluate: Requires corrective action plan (CAPA) or revised samples.
[ ] Rejected: Score $< 3.5$, or failed critical social/safety compliance.

Reviewer Notes: ______________________________ ____________________________________